El dilema de John Stuart Mill
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper discusses the idea that John Stuart Mill supported two intellectual positions which are considered to be contradictory. On one hand, he proposed a radical empiricist epistemology in his System of Logic. other defended David Ricardo’s Political Economy, fairly criticized its time from an empirical point view. argues there is no internal contradiction Mill, as believes method used Economy (criticized for being priori) necessary because difficulties rise due nature study object. Furthermore, suggests it only possible social sciences may use.
 Key words: J.S. economic methodology, epistemology.
 JEL Classification: B12, B41.
 Resumen: Este artículo discute la de que mantuvo dos posiciones intelectuales consideradas como contradictorias. Por un lado, él propuso una epistemología radicalmente empirista en su el otro, defendió Economía Política Ricardo, bastante criticada desde perspectiva empírica momento. argumenta hay contradicción interna ya postula método usado por (criticado apriorismo) es necesario debido las dificultades propias del objeto estudio. Incluso, sostiene ese único posible para ciencias sociales.
 Palabras clave: metodología económica, epistemología.
 Clasificación JEL: B41.
منابع مشابه
Utilitarianism without Consequentialism: The Case of John Stuart Mill
In this essay I will argue, flouting paradox, that Mill was a utilitarian but not a consequentialist. According to the textbook definition, of course, utilitarianism just is the combination of a certain sort of theory of the good (as pleasure, happiness, or flourishing) and a consequentialist theory of the right. My conclusion thus seems necessarily false. Nevertheless, the argument will procee...
متن کاملBarbarian thoughts: imperialism in the philosophy of John Stuart Mill
Mill’s political and his international theory rest on a philosophy of history drawn in turn from the experience of nineteenth century imperialism. And yet, this philosophy of history remains unexamined in Political Theory and International Relations (IR) alike, largely because of the peculiar division of labour between the two disciplines. In this article I will argue that this omission results...
متن کاملJohn Stuart Mill, innate differences, and the regulation of reproduction.
In this paper, we show that the question of the relative importance of innate characteristics and institutional arrangements in explaining human difference was vehemently contested in Britain during the first half of the nineteenth century. Thus Sir Francis Galton's work of the 1860s should be seen as an intervention in a pre-existing controversy. The central figure in these earlier debates-as ...
متن کاملUTILITARIANISM John Stuart Mill Abridged by H . Gene Blocker Library of Liberal Arts Archive
“greatest happiness principle” holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness, is intended pleasure and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain and the privation of pleasure. To give a clear view of the moral standard set up by the theory, much more requires to be said; in particular, what thin...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Procesos de mercado
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1697-6797']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v7i2.273